Index Thread Archive Feb-2000 Archive Send

Subject:  C-3S/Small boon tri-banders Author:  John Langdon <jlangdon@outer.net> Date:  23-Feb-2000 15:49:42 IMHO The LP will probably be superior on 12 and 17, the C3S will be better on 20-15-10. Even a small LP will likely have a significantly larger wind load - in fact a C3S and WARC-7 might be roughly comparable in wind load, and will work a lot better on the ham bands plus add 30M. 73 John N5CQ -----Original Message----- From: Louis Sica, Jr. [mailto:lsica@visi.com] Sent: Wednesday, February 23, 2000 2:46 PM To: force12talk@qth.com Subject: [Force 12 Talk] C-3S/Small boon tri-banders Looking for people's experiences with the C-3S vs other short-boom (12' or less) tri-banders. Particularly interested in the C-3's 17m/12m performance vs short (14~30MHz/6 el/12') log periodics.... --- Lou AC0X lsica@visi.com -------------------------------------------- Force12Talk mailing list provided as a service by Force 12 Antennas, Inc. Force 12 Web site: http://www.qth.com/force12 Force12Talk Message Archive: http://www.qth.com/force12/list/force12talk To unsubscribe, send a blank e-mail to force12talk-leave@qth.com For problems with the list, contact force12@qth.com -------------------------------------------- Force12Talk mailing list provided as a service by Force 12 Antennas, Inc. Force 12 Web site: http://www.qth.com/force12 Force12Talk Message Archive: http://www.qth.com/force12/list/force12talk To unsubscribe, send a blank e-mail to force12talk-leave@qth.com For problems with the list, contact force12@qth.com

This Thread   Date    Author    * 23-Feb-2000 John Langdon 23-Feb-2000 Herb Rosenberg 23-Feb-2000 Louis Jr. Sica

This Author (Feb-2000)   Subject    Date    * C-3S/Small boon tri-banders 23-Feb-2000 C-3SS and WARC 2/2 Vertical Seperation? 27-Feb-2000 C3 23-Feb-2000