| Index | Thread | Archive | Mar-2000 | Archive | Send |
 |
  |
  |
   |
|
  |
|
XR, but the hassle of the extra antenna was not worth it for me. I decided t o stack another C-31XR and C-3E below to help the high bands (and actually it is much better for contesting!). Keep in mind these antennas are not for the faint at heart! I have handl ed the KLM (40' boom) 20 meter monobander, the KT-34XA and the C-31XR and be lieve me the C-51XR is MUCH more difficult to handle (close to 200#). If your working with AB105, you should already realize this (Hi). My ham friend W9ZRX has some AB105 in his 3 tower station and used to have many monobanders o n that tower (I think 6 total). Should be a good setup for you. 73's, Kevin --> WN9O wn9o@usa.net >Jack <poster@gate.net> wrote: >Yes looks like its the way to go. Ive thought about the C-49XR but may > not >be worth the trouble to have to put a 2 or 3 el forty underneath it to > get the >forty. >I want to put a WARC-7 on there too for the other bands. I would put >that at the very top. I plan to put it all on a AB105 29" wide all the > way up >to 100ft with a sled riding up the side to carry the antennas. >I may just go with the C-51XR and the WARC-7 above it, that would make i t >simple. > >Jack >WB4ROY Get free email and a permanent address at http://www.netaddress.com/?N= 1 -------------------------------------------- Force12Talk mailing list provided as a service by Force 12 Antennas, Inc. Force 12 Web site: http://www.qth.com/force12 Submissions: send to Force12Talk@qth.com To unsubscribe: send a blank e-mail to Force12Talk-leave@qth.com Force12Talk Message Archive: http://www.qth.com/force12/list/force12talk For problems with the list, contact force12@qth.com |
This Thread
|
This Author (Mar-2000)
|