Index Thread Archive Jun-2000 Archive Send
 Main index   Previous in threadNext in thread   Previous in archiveNext in archive   Index by Subject for Jun-2000Index by Author for Jun-2000Index by Date for Jun-2000   Index by Subject for ArchiveIndex by Author for ArchiveIndex by Date for Archive   Reply to messageNew message 

Subject: !0 meter VSWR
Author: Rick Lehman <rlehman@gate.net>
Date: 18-Jun-2000 20:23:07

Hi Pete, thanks for the response. No, I do not have an impedance analyzer
so I do not know the real and reactive components of the impedance. I agree
that adding coax will change the impedance as seen by the transmitter, but
if memory serves me, an ideal lossless line will move you concentric around
the center of the smith chart which means no change in VSWR. A constant
VSWR is a circle around the smith Chart. So while the impedance would
change drastically the VSWR should remain the same. A real world transmisson
line has loss but, 5 feet of loss is close to zero and in any case more loss
would tend to make the VSWR better anyway. Loss makes the impedance spiral
in toward the center of the chart (therefore closer to 50 ohms). I am
still unable to explain what I see.


Thanks again for your response.

Rick

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Pete Smith [mailto:n4zr@contesting.com]
> Sent: Sunday, June 18, 2000 9:10 AM
> To: Rick Lehman
> Subject: RE: [Force 12 Talk] !0 meter VSWR
>
>
> At 07:11 AM 6/18/00 -0400, you wrote:
> >I have a C19XR with a high VSWR (when measured at the
> transmitter end of the
> >coax) on 10 meters and do not use an LP filter. It was
> suggested by force
> >12 that I add about 5 feet of coax. I did that and to my amazement it
> >worked. I have been trying to understand why this would work
> and have not
> >yet come up with a technical explanation (Force 12 cannot explain it
> >either). With an ideal line, the length of coax should not make a
> >difference on the VSWR seen at the transmitter. It instead would only
> >affect the phase angle from a Smith Chart standpoint. From a real world
> >lossy line standpoint, 5 feet of coax is not long enough to cause any
> >appreciable loss or effect on the VSWR. My first thought was
> that the force
> >12 balun was bad as the symptoms suggest that the coax was functioning as
> >part of the antenna. However, I removed the 5 feet of coax,
> and replaced
> >the balun with a current balun from Hygain. The results were the same as
> >with the force 12 balun... Therefore I have ruled out this
> possibility. My
> >coax is new, so I am for the time being ruling out this possibility. The
> >antenna seems to work fine on 10 meters, but I am bothered that I do not
> >understand this phenomena. Any ideas?
>
> Hi Rick -- It seems to me that the feedpoint of the antenna is some
> impedance other than 50+j0. That being the case, any length of feedline
> will transform the feedpoint impedance to something else, which
> may be seen
> by your SWR bridge at the other end of the line as a higher or lower VSWR.
> Your 5 feet is ~ 90 degrees at 10 meters, or almost the maximum
> transformation (I think) that can be done this way. Probably
> your previous
> length was "just wrong" in terms of the impedance presented at the rig.
>
> This being said, I don't quite understand what the deal is - the impedance
> at the feed of the C19 should be close enough to 50 ohms so this doesn't
> happen. Did you happen to measure the R+/-j at the feedpoint?
>
>
> 73, Pete Smith N4ZR
> n4zr@contesting.com
>
>
>



--------------------------------------------
Force12Talk mailing list provided as a service by Force 12 Antennas, Inc.
Force 12 Web site: http://www.qth.com/force12

Submissions: send to Force12Talk@qth.com
To unsubscribe: send a blank e-mail to Force12Talk-leave@qth.com
Force12Talk Message Archive: http://www.qth.com/force12/list/force12talk
For problems with the list, contact force12@qth.com


This Thread
  Date   Author  
18-Jun-2000 Rick Lehman
* 18-Jun-2000 Rick Lehman
18-Jun-2000 Barry Kirkwood
18-Jun-2000 Jeff Stai KQ6VQ
18-Jun-2000 Rick Lehman
17-Jun-2000 Tony
17-Jun-2000 Natan Huffman
This Author (Jun-2000)
  Subject   Date  
!0 meter VSWR 18-Jun-2000
* !0 meter VSWR 18-Jun-2000
!0 meter VSWR 18-Jun-2000