Index Thread Archive Jul-2000 Archive Send
 Main index   Previous in threadNext in thread   Previous in archiveNext in archive   Index by Subject for Jul-2000Index by Author for Jul-2000Index by Date for Jul-2000   Index by Subject for ArchiveIndex by Author for ArchiveIndex by Date for Archive   Reply to messageNew message 

Subject: C3 vs C3s or C3ss
Author: Pete Smith <n4zr@contesting.com>
Date: 12-Jul-2000 16:23:38
At 03:51 PM 7/12/00 -0500, Richard Thorne wrote:
>Go with the C3 or maybe the C3E. Both antennas are less than 6 square
feet of
>load. Your tower should be able to handle it as well as the rotor. While
the
>C3S and SS both have similar performance, you mine as well go with the full
>size C3. The C3e adds a reflector on 10 meters and improves performace on
10.

I totally agree. The extra 10m bandwidth of the C-3 or C-3E may not be an
advantage, but the E configuration (3 elements on 10) is not available in
the shorter-boom models and is worth having for a little extra money...

73, Pete Smith N4ZR

The World Contest Station Database
is back up and running at
http://www.qsl.net/n4zr




--------------------------------------------
Force12Talk mailing list provided as a service by Force 12 Antennas, Inc.
Force 12 Web site: http://www.qth.com/force12

Submissions: send to Force12Talk@qth.com
To unsubscribe: send a blank e-mail to Force12Talk-leave@qth.com
Force12Talk Message Archive: http://www.qth.com/force12/list/force12talk
For problems with the list, contact force12@qth.com


This Thread
  Date   Author  
* 12-Jul-2000 Pete Smith
12-Jul-2000 Richard Thorne
12-Jul-2000 GARY GADWA
This Author (Jul-2000)
  Subject   Date  
C3 over Cushcraft A4 08-Jul-2000
C3 vs C19XR 10-Jul-2000
* C3 vs C3s or C3ss 12-Jul-2000
create/emoto 24-Jul-2000
Force 12 low profile crank up towers 13-Jul-2000
News from Bencher 16-Jul-2000
W5DV asks 24-Jul-2000