Index Thread Archive Jul-2000 Archive Send
 Main index   Previous in threadNext in thread   Previous in archiveNext in archive   Index by Subject for Jul-2000Index by Author for Jul-2000Index by Date for Jul-2000   Index by Subject for ArchiveIndex by Author for ArchiveIndex by Date for Archive   Reply to messageNew message 

Subject: C3 vs s or ss
Author: GARY GADWA <ggadwa@ruralnetwork.net>
Date: 12-Jul-2000 17:14:27
Thanks much for some excellent comments on the C3 series. The strongest
selling points seem to be leaning toward the C3E. This antenna is not
covered (at least I couldn't find it) at the Force 12 site. From all the
responses it would seem going for the extra element on 10 and reportedly
improved F/B and wider bandwith for the money looks to be the best bet. The
s and ss models being smaller are probably just the thing for limited space.
Functionality of adding the 40 element later is great!
I sure am pleased with the number of claims of performance above and
beyond many other tribanders.....Just what I'd expect on this site. And I
belive'em too......

73,
GARY
W7FSI
Stanley, Idaho



--------------------------------------------
Force12Talk mailing list provided as a service by Force 12 Antennas, Inc.
Force 12 Web site: http://www.qth.com/force12

Submissions: send to Force12Talk@qth.com
To unsubscribe: send a blank e-mail to Force12Talk-leave@qth.com
Force12Talk Message Archive: http://www.qth.com/force12/list/force12talk
For problems with the list, contact force12@qth.com


This Thread
  Date   Author  
* 12-Jul-2000 GARY GADWA
This Author (Jul-2000)
  Subject   Date  
C3 vs C3s or C3ss 12-Jul-2000
* C3 vs s or ss 12-Jul-2000