Index Thread Archive Aug-2000 Archive Send
 Main index   Previous in threadNext in thread   Previous in archiveNext in archive   Index by Subject for Aug-2000Index by Author for Aug-2000Index by Date for Aug-2000   Index by Subject for ArchiveIndex by Author for ArchiveIndex by Date for Archive   Reply to messageNew message 

Subject: Isolated elements
Author: Al Williams <alwilliams@olywa.net>
Date: 31-Aug-2000 22:56:53
The postings on Force isolated elements are very timely as I am about to
choose which antennas to put on my two new 70' towers. Here in Puget Sound
(Western Washington), we have only 2 or 3 lightning storms each year. But
we do have our share of rain(50/60 inches here in Olympia which isn't all
that high). It doesn't rain hard, mostly drizzly with the droplets small.
I surmise that the charge on droplets is small based on low lightning
activity.

I will appreciate comments, especially from similar qth's. Also, wouldn't
wire dipoles be similarly effected? Insulated or non-insulated wire?

I plan to install a ground rod for each leg of the tower. With such low
lightning activity,
it may be overkill but it only takes one strike!(?). Comments please.

k7puc
----- Original Message -----
From: "Pete Smith" <n4zr@contesting.com>
To: <Force12Talk@qth.com>
Sent: Thursday, August 31, 2000 8:07 PM
Subject: Re: Fw: [Force 12 Talk] Isolated elements


> At 11:11 AM 9/1/00 +1200, Barry Kirkwood wrote:
> >Hello Force 12ers,
> >Am interested in this. Have had one reply saying that bonding braid of
coax
> >to boom upstream from balun works OK. Any other opinions/experiences?
> >Would expect this to reduce rain/snow static.
> >Alternatives might be to use high value resistors from DE feed to boom,
or
> >RF chokes?
>
> My antenna switch has 1.5 megohm resistors from center to ground on each
of
> the antennas -- and I still get really bad rain static from some (by no
> means all) rain and snowstorms. It seems as if some have more charge than
> others, and just the transfer from the raindrops to the antenna is enough
> to generate that nice steady roar.
>
>
> 73, Pete Smith N4ZR
>
> The World Contest Station Database
> is back up and running at
> http://www.qsl.net/n4zr
>
>
>
>
> --------------------------------------------
> Force12Talk mailing list provided as a service by Force 12 Antennas, Inc.
> Force 12 Web site: http://www.qth.com/force12
>
> Submissions: send to Force12Talk@qth.com
> To unsubscribe: send a blank e-mail to Force12Talk-leave@qth.com
> Force12Talk Message Archive: http://www.qth.com/force12/list/force12talk
> For problems with the list, contact n4zr@qth.com
>
>



--------------------------------------------
Force12Talk mailing list provided as a service by Force 12 Antennas, Inc.
Force 12 Web site: http://www.qth.com/force12

Submissions: send to Force12Talk@qth.com
To unsubscribe: send a blank e-mail to Force12Talk-leave@qth.com
Force12Talk Message Archive: http://www.qth.com/force12/list/force12talk
For problems with the list, contact n4zr@qth.com


This Thread
  Date   Author  
04-Sep-2000 Will
04-Sep-2000 N2TK
* 31-Aug-2000 Al Williams
31-Aug-2000 Pete Smith
29-Aug-2000 greg NoT a PhD
29-Aug-2000 Barry Kirkwood
29-Aug-2000 ww
29-Aug-2000 Guy K2AV Olinger
29-Aug-2000 Wil DJ7AA
28-Aug-2000 Guy K2AV Olinger
28-Aug-2000 wa4dou@juno.com
28-Aug-2000 Danny
This Author (Aug-2000)
  Subject   Date  
* Isolated elements 31-Aug-2000
Vertical/antenna questions 04-Aug-2000
Vertical/antenna questions 04-Aug-2000