Index Thread Archive Feb-2001 Archive Send
 Main index   Previous in threadNext in thread   Previous in archiveNext in archive   Index by Subject for Feb-2001Index by Author for Feb-2001Index by Date for Feb-2001   Index by Subject for ArchiveIndex by Author for ArchiveIndex by Date for Archive   Reply to messageNew message 

Subject: Rivets
Author: WilDJ7AA <dj7aa-wil@t-online.de>
Date: 27-Feb-2001 01:51:21
I do have still this rivet problem. And it is not the element
connection,
it is the factory mad connection of the boom--boom connector of my
Magnum 620. These rivets are 120 degrees in 3 sets, but they are all
fall down, just 2 years after have the beam up on the tower. A simple
bolt will help, but how to climb 30m and then go 4 m outside off the
boom.

I think, Force12 must look for a better technology to assemble this.
(I had the D-Model, so for extrem winds) I dont see any words
from the factory himselfe about this problem. I really disapointing
about this on my antenne. Not a good construction for those money we had
to pay for the antenna.

M² monobanders looks much better in mechanical construction. I believe
this would my first and only Force12 Antenna.

73 Wil DJ7AA


K7LXC@aol.com schrieb:
>
> In a message dated 2/26/01 9:59:28 PM Pacific Standard Time, list@qth.com
> writes:
>
> > Surprise surprise, yet another story of rivets failing on Force12
> > antennas. I've included a couple of quotes from Tom N6BT from July last
> > year which make interesting reading. It looks like this isn't as rare a
> > situation as Tom claims (I have only seen three F12 antennas close up
> > that have been installed for more than a year and ALL have had the rivet
> > problem).
> >
> It seems to me that the problem with one set of rivets is that it DOES
> provide enough room for the elements to work against themselves and the
> rivets (the guys in Texas have this problem as well - they used to call KLM
> Konstantly Losing Metal). I think that if you did two sets of rivets 180
> degrees apart from each other or even three sets spaced every 120 degrees
> that you would be able to eliminate any working of the elements. What you
> would be doing would be putting opposing forces on the element in the case of
> the 180 arrangement and even more security with the 120 degree approach.
>
> Cheers, Steve K7LXC
> Tower Tech
>
> --------------------------------------------
> Force12Talk mailing list provided as a service by Force 12 Antennas, Inc.
> Force 12 Web site: http://www.qth.com/force12
>
> Submissions: send to Force12Talk@qth.com
> To unsubscribe: send a blank e-mail to Force12Talk-leave@qth.com
> Force12Talk Message Archive: http://www.qth.com/force12/list/force12talk
> For problems with the list, contact n4zr@qth.com


--------------------------------------------
Force12Talk mailing list provided as a service by Force 12 Antennas, Inc.
Force 12 Web site: http://www.qth.com/force12

Submissions: send to Force12Talk@qth.com
To unsubscribe: send a blank e-mail to Force12Talk-leave@qth.com
Force12Talk Message Archive: http://www.qth.com/force12/list/force12talk
For problems with the list, contact n4zr@qth.com


This Thread
  Date   Author  
01-Mar-2001 Andrew Williamson
01-Mar-2001 Pete Smith
01-Mar-2001 K7LXC@aol.com
01-Mar-2001 Dale L Martin
01-Mar-2001 J. Edward \ Ed\ Muns
01-Mar-2001 Roger Huntley
01-Mar-2001 Pete Smith
01-Mar-2001 Tyler Stewart
01-Mar-2001 Andrew Williamson
01-Mar-2001 Andrew Williamson
01-Mar-2001 Andrew Williamson
01-Mar-2001 Alan H. Robinson
27-Feb-2001 Richard Thorne
27-Feb-2001 dan r goddard
27-Feb-2001 Pete Smith
27-Feb-2001 WilDJ7AA
27-Feb-2001 Tom Brown
* 27-Feb-2001 WilDJ7AA
27-Feb-2001 K7LXC@aol.com
This Author (Feb-2001)
  Subject   Date  
Rivets 27-Feb-2001
* Rivets 27-Feb-2001