Index Thread Archive Aug-2001 Archive Send
 Main index   Previous in threadNext in thread   Previous in archiveNext in archive   Index by Subject for Aug-2001Index by Author for Aug-2001Index by Date for Aug-2001   Index by Subject for ArchiveIndex by Author for ArchiveIndex by Date for Archive   Reply to messageNew message 

Subject: F12 Quality, A General Comment
Author: Hank Phillips <aa4hp@titustek.com>
Date: 05-Aug-2001 16:08:08
There may have been no general consensus on the delivered quality of F12
antennas posted on the reflector this weekend, but there was certainly a
consensus on what F12 customers expected (and may be willing to pay for)
from the company.

I would summarize that expectation as quality, quality, quality, nothing less.

I really like my C-31XR, but it was not a problem-free antenna, due mainly
to the inadequacy of the installation instructions, and the lack of
sufficient bracing in the 15/20 meter driven element spacing. I posted
this beef last year in detail on this reflector.

I would like to see F12 be profitable enough to continue to prosper and
develop new and innovative designs, but it is clear that the F12 customer
base is quality driven. I hope the management keeps that high on their
list of priorities.

73,

Hank
AA4HP



--------------------------------------------
Force12Talk mailing list provided as a service by Force 12 Antennas, Inc.
Web sites: http://www.qth.com/force12 and http://www.force12inc.com

Submissions: send to Force12Talk@qth.com
To unsubscribe: send a blank e-mail to Force12Talk-leave@qth.com
Force12Talk Message Archive: http://www.qth.com/force12/list/force12talk
For problems with the list, contact n4zr@qth.com

This Thread
  Date   Author  
05-Aug-2001 Frank C. Travanty
* 05-Aug-2001 Hank Phillips
This Author (Aug-2001)
  Subject   Date  
* F12 Quality, A General Comment 05-Aug-2001