|
Well I thought that there might be an advantage to move the 6 meter beam closer to the 20 meter beam and it would be less affected as the 17 thru 10 meter beam. 73 -----Original Message----- From: Harris Leck VK4CWT [mailto:leckfam@attglobal.net] Sent: Saturday, August 18, 2001 7:37 PM To: Bob Marzari Subject: RE: [Force 12 Talk] Spacing AGAIN Bob, I stacked a 6 ele 6 meter beam about 6' above a C4-E (at 60'). There was interaction in that it moved the SWR point a fair bit on the F12. I increased the spacing to 8' and had no interaction. Given 15' of mast I would say Tom is right on the money. GL Harris VE6DK VK4CWT -----Original Message----- From: Bob Marzari [mailto:w3pt@itech.net] Sent: Sunday, August 19, 2001 5:40 AM To: Force12Talk Subject: [Force 12 Talk] Spacing AGAIN Hello everyone... In stacking a MAG620, 4BA and an EF606 on 15 feet of mast. Tom said put the EF606 in the middle. The question is: Would it be better to minimize interactions by keeping the EF606 closer to the MAG620 rather than the 7 feet above and below the two HF antennas? Getting antsy now as my tower is finally on its way from USTower. Ordered it at Dayton..... Bob, W3PT -------------------------------------------- Force12Talk mailing list provided as a service by Force 12 Antennas, Inc. Web sites: http://www.qth.com/force12 and http://www.force12inc.com Submissions: send to Force12Talk@qth.com To unsubscribe: send a blank e-mail to Force12Talk-leave@qth.com Force12Talk Message Archive: http://www.qth.com/force12/list/force12talk For problems with the list, contact n4zr@qth.com -------------------------------------------- Force12Talk mailing list provided as a service by Force 12 Antennas, Inc. Web sites: http://www.qth.com/force12 and http://www.force12inc.com Submissions: send to Force12Talk@qth.com To unsubscribe: send a blank e-mail to Force12Talk-leave@qth.com Force12Talk Message Archive: http://www.qth.com/force12/list/force12talk For problems with the list, contact n4zr@qth.com |
This Thread
|
This Author (Aug-2001)
|