Index Thread Archive Oct-2002 Archive Send
 Main index   Previous in threadNext in thread   Previous in archiveNext in archive   Index by Subject for Oct-2002Index by Author for Oct-2002Index by Date for Oct-2002   Index by Subject for ArchiveIndex by Author for ArchiveIndex by Date for Archive   Reply to messageNew message 

Subject: 40 Meter Dipoles and DXing
Author: Alan Day <Alan_Day@compuserve.com>
Date: 07-Oct-2002 15:16:42
Greetings...

I thought I'd contribute my somewhat hasty comparison of 40m inverted Vs
and a rotary dipole.

I recently built a Force 12 Mag140N rotary dipole for my part-time QTH, and
installed it right above the old HyGain 204BA at 79'. The tower is on a
hill that rises sharply to between 300' and 400' over the surrounding
terrain (see photo of QTH and tower - without 140N - at qrz.com). I had
previously been using two wire dipoles, mounted more or less as inverted
Vs, one broadside toward Europe at 60' and the other toward the Far East at
76'. The advantage of each in the intended direction was significant,
typically one to two S units, and undoubtedly would have been greater had
they been straight dipoles. (I suspect the difference would have been
considerably less if the tower had been on flat terrain, as 76' is not
electrically high at 40m.)

I was unable - not surprisingly - to compare the 140N with the higher
inverted V because they thoroughly hosed each other up. With that one out
of the way, I compared the 140N to the other one at 60' (this one actually
had one leg almost straight out, the other angling down at about 40
degrees). (No doubt there was still some interaction, but it was not
noticable as a significant shift in swr.) Toward Europe, signal levels
were indistinguishable between the two antennas. (I should mention that
simulation with TA shows several db advantage toward Europe at the lower
height, given the shape of this particular hill.) In other directions, the
advantage gained by rotating the 140N to the optimal position was quite
significant. So far, I have used the 140N very little, but signal reports
and performance in several pileups have been extremely encouraging. Let's
see if it survives a winter on the hill. I had to rebuild the 204BA with
fat elements to prevent the annual spring walk through the woods to collect
pieces.

73, Al K8AL


--------------------------------------------
Force12Talk mailing list provided as a service by Force 12 Antennas, Inc.
Force12 Web Site: http://www.force12inc.com

To Submit Message to the List: Force12Talk@qth.com
To unsubscribe and view the Message Archive: see http://qth.com/force12/list
For problems with the list: contact n4zr@qth.com

This Thread
  Date   Author  
07-Oct-2002 Alan Day
* 07-Oct-2002 Alan Day
06-Oct-2002 Roy D Lincoln
06-Oct-2002 John Petrich
06-Oct-2002 Steven Rutledge
06-Oct-2002 John Petrich
06-Oct-2002 Hank Phillips
This Author (Oct-2002)
  Subject   Date  
40 Meter Dipoles and DXing 07-Oct-2002
* 40 Meter Dipoles and DXing 07-Oct-2002