| Index | Thread | Archive | Apr-2003 | Archive | Send |
 |
  |
|
   |
|
  |
|
I was referring to the bottom T bar - but please NB that my results are not accurate enough to matter whether you use the bottom of the T bar or the bottom of the mounting post, which is only a few foot lower. As I understand it the GT is just a heavy duty version with the same dimensions except possibly element diameter. The same results apply, with the same caveats! 73, Andrew ZS1AN > -----Original Message----- > From: Mike [mailto:mikemccoy@austin.rr.com] > Sent: Thursday, April 24, 2003 7:40 PM > To: Andrew Roos; KEN SILVERMAN; Rich Holoch; Force12Talk@qth.com > Subject: Re: [Force 12 Talk] RE: Sigma 5 Height > > > > > > With the base from 1 to 5m above ground... > > When ya'll speak of "the base", are you referring to the distance from > ground to the bottom T-Bar? Or from the ground to the bottom end of the > mounting extension tube, i.e. the bottom of the tube that extends > below the > bottom T Bar? > > (Hope that made sense) > > And since (I think) they are 'functionally equivilent', do you think > everyones findings would apply to a Sigma5 GT as well? > > 73, > Mike K5PU > > > -------------------------------------------- Force12Talk mailing list provided as a service by Force 12 Antennas, Inc. Force12 Web Site: http://www.force12inc.com To Submit Message to the List: Force12Talk@qth.com To unsubscribe and view the Message Archive: see http://qth.com/force12/list For problems with the list: contact n4zr@qth.com |