|
mile, I'll remember that. 73 Jamie WW3S ----- Original Message ----- From: "Peter Larsen" <ve6yc@shaw.ca> To: "Bud Hippisley, K2KIR" <k2kir@telenet.net>; <force12talk@qth.com> Sent: Monday, May 05, 2003 8:39 PM Subject: Re: [Force 12 Talk] Re: Force 12 vs. Tennadyne > >Instead of comparing apples and oranges, what I'd prefer to see is _L. B. > Cebik's_ > >calculation of the C31XR gain, not Force12's..... > > Why not drop by: http://www.championradio.com/ > and pick up Ward (N0AX) and Steve's (K7LXC) HF Triband Performance > report? > This is a test of real world "gain" over a 4873 foot path. > Antennas tested were a reference di-pole, and: > Gem Quad > TA-33 > C-3 > KT34XA > Skyhawk > TH-11 > TH-7 > Pro-77 > X-9 > C-31XR > Pro-57B > > Sorry, but no Logs in the report. > I know that the XA and Mosley crowd don't like the report, but check out the > F-12 gain figures vs. the report figures. > > Well worth reading and thinking about, but not the be all end all to HF > antenna > testing. > > BTW the top 3 antennas in the large boom category were: > C-31XR, X-9, Skyhawk in that order. > Short boom category were: > C-3, TA-33, Gem Quad. > (the C-3 would have been 5th in the large category, just ahead of the TH-7, > and out does the KT34XA on 20 and 15.) > > Just my 2 cents worth. > > Peter > VE6YC > > > > > > > -------------------------------------------- > Force12Talk mailing list provided as a service by Force 12 Antennas, Inc. > Force12 Web Site: http://www.force12inc.com > > To Submit Message to the List: Force12Talk@qth.com > To unsubscribe and view the Message Archive: see http://qth.com/force12/list > For problems with the list: contact n4zr@qth.com > > -------------------------------------------- Force12Talk mailing list provided as a service by Force 12 Antennas, Inc. Force12 Web Site: http://www.force12inc.com To Submit Message to the List: Force12Talk@qth.com To unsubscribe and view the Message Archive: see http://qth.com/force12/list For problems with the list: contact n4zr@qth.com |