Index Thread Archive May-2003 Archive Send
 Main index   Previous in threadNext in thread   Previous in archiveNext in archive   Index by Subject for May-2003Index by Author for May-2003Index by Date for May-2003   Index by Subject for ArchiveIndex by Author for ArchiveIndex by Date for Archive   Reply to messageNew message 

Subject: F12 dependability
Author: Jim Brannigan <jbrannig@optonline.net>
Date: 08-May-2003 19:55:03
Sir,
I am the owner of a C-3 that exists under moderate weather conditions and
performs well.
I understand the cost and effort that goes into erecting your fine antenna
system. The anger that comes with a manufacturer not meeting expectations
is also understood.
Your experience with F-12 seems to be the exception and might fall under the
category of "Stuff happens". It would be useful to see the antennas that
did survive your particular conditions.
We would all learn from it.

Jim


> In message <E19D97Q-0001vd-Kf.2003-05-06-21-33-55@imailg2.svr.pol.co.uk>
> , Tom, the owner of Force12 writes
>
> >There certainly are
> >exceptions in weather conditions and one who lives in those zones should
> >make it known at the time of order, regardless of the company they
purchase
> >from. I have tracked wind patterns and storm types for several years and
> >know how to build antennas to meet any conditions.
>
> In that case, would you like to explain the long list of failures on the
> 100mph rated Magnum 340 that I've shown, most with high resolution
> pictures, at
>
> http://www.gi0nwg.freeserve.co.uk/F12/index.htm
>
> This antenna was installed at a location which semi-regularly sees gusts
> in the 80mph region but only on the very odd occasion (once every few
> years) sees them get anywhere near 100mph. In fact, the local
> government owned weather monitoring station shows the maximum gust for a
> 30 year period in this area to be 87 knots (100mph). I think you'd
> agree that the 100mph version was probably the one to install here. We
> done our homework and that is why the 100mph rated antenna was bought
> instead of the 80mph one, but it still failed numerous times and in lots
> of places that the wind has no real effect on.
>
> I've taken a lot of stick from some people on this reflector for
> highlighting problem areas on some F12 antennas and have been called a
> F12 basher. Those people are very quick to come back on my comments and
> virtually call me a liar. To those people, take a look at the photos
> and then ask yourself what you'd say and do if you owned this antenna.
> Remember, it's supposed to be rated at 100mph and the local government
> owned weather station has only recorded a peak wind gust at 100mph in a
> 30 year period.
>
> Andrew Williamson GI0NWG / AC6WI
> Homepage = http://www.gi0nwg.freeserve.co.uk/



--------------------------------------------
Force12Talk mailing list provided as a service by Force 12 Antennas, Inc.
Force12 Web Site: http://www.force12inc.com

To Submit Message to the List: Force12Talk@qth.com
To unsubscribe and view the Message Archive: see http://qth.com/force12/list
For problems with the list: contact n4zr@qth.com

This Thread
  Date   Author  
10-May-2003 VR2BrettGraham
09-May-2003 mikekirchoff@msn.com
09-May-2003 Andrew Williamson
09-May-2003 Andrew Williamson
09-May-2003 Andrew Williamson
09-May-2003 WA9ALS - John
09-May-2003 Ray Minehan
09-May-2003 Jeff Griffin
09-May-2003 wa4dou@juno.com
09-May-2003 Andrew Williamson
09-May-2003 Andrew Williamson
09-May-2003 Andrew Williamson
09-May-2003 wa4dou@juno.com
09-May-2003 wa4dou@juno.com
09-May-2003 Andrew Williamson
09-May-2003 KXBill
09-May-2003 n3drk
09-May-2003 Reichow, Gary J.
09-May-2003 WD4K
09-May-2003 Guy Olinger, K2AV
09-May-2003 Tom Cox
09-May-2003 Pete Smith
09-May-2003 wa4dou@juno.com
09-May-2003 WD4K
09-May-2003 Andrew Williamson
08-May-2003 WD4K
* 08-May-2003 Jim Brannigan
08-May-2003 Andrew Williamson
07-May-2003 Andrew Williamson
06-May-2003 WD4K
06-May-2003 Steven Rutledge
06-May-2003 Guy Olinger, K2AV
06-May-2003 Andrew Williamson
06-May-2003 James W. Fisher, Jr.
05-May-2003 WD4K
This Author (May-2003)
  Subject   Date  
dipole vs. Mosley TA33-SR 09-May-2003
* F12 dependability 08-May-2003
Force 12 vs. Tennadyne 06-May-2003
Question for the assembled wisdom 21-May-2003