Index Thread Archive May-2003 Archive Send
 Main index   Previous in threadNext in thread   Previous in archiveNext in archive   Index by Subject for May-2003Index by Author for May-2003Index by Date for May-2003   Index by Subject for ArchiveIndex by Author for ArchiveIndex by Date for Archive   Reply to messageNew message 

Subject: F12 dependability
Author: WD4K <WD4K2@Charter.net>
Date: 08-May-2003 22:13:50
In all due respect..there is something fishy here. I recall Andrew saying in
a recent mail that his 5Ba had seen winds of 106, but then he says that
local records only show a gust of 100mph within the past thirty years, and
seems to me that IF he knew about the 106, which he did by his own
statement, then why would he order a 100mph antenna and then complain about
it? Seems to me his facts seem to change as he sees fit... to adjust the
spin on the Force 12 story to fit his needs. I am confused. Why would anyone
who knew or even SUSPECT that windgusts would get to 106, buy a 100mph
antenna? Over the past three years or so this same old tired story has more
twists, spins and hot air than the tornados that just wrecked half this
country.
So, we all know that Andrew hates F12, whoopee...time to move on. I hear
Mosley Antennas are not coming to Dayton for the first time in years...Bet
he can get a deal on one of those:) Tommy

-----Original Message-----
From: Andrew Williamson [mailto:andrew@gi0nwg.freeserve.co.uk]
Sent: Thursday, May 08, 2003 7:32 PM
To: force12talk@qth.com
Subject: [Force 12 Talk] F12 dependability


In message <E19D97Q-0001vd-Kf.2003-05-06-21-33-55@imailg2.svr.pol.co.uk>
, Tom, the owner of Force12 writes

>There certainly are
>exceptions in weather conditions and one who lives in those zones should
>make it known at the time of order, regardless of the company they purchase
>from. I have tracked wind patterns and storm types for several years and
>know how to build antennas to meet any conditions.

In that case, would you like to explain the long list of failures on the
100mph rated Magnum 340 that I've shown, most with high resolution
pictures, at

http://www.gi0nwg.freeserve.co.uk/F12/index.htm

This antenna was installed at a location which semi-regularly sees gusts
in the 80mph region but only on the very odd occasion (once every few
years) sees them get anywhere near 100mph. In fact, the local
government owned weather monitoring station shows the maximum gust for a
30 year period in this area to be 87 knots (100mph). I think you'd
agree that the 100mph version was probably the one to install here. We
done our homework and that is why the 100mph rated antenna was bought
instead of the 80mph one, but it still failed numerous times and in lots
of places that the wind has no real effect on.

I've taken a lot of stick from some people on this reflector for
highlighting problem areas on some F12 antennas and have been called a
F12 basher. Those people are very quick to come back on my comments and
virtually call me a liar. To those people, take a look at the photos
and then ask yourself what you'd say and do if you owned this antenna.
Remember, it's supposed to be rated at 100mph and the local government
owned weather station has only recorded a peak wind gust at 100mph in a
30 year period.

Andrew Williamson GI0NWG / AC6WI
Homepage = http://www.gi0nwg.freeserve.co.uk/

One of the ZL9CI gang
http://www.qsl.net/zl9ci/


--------------------------------------------
Force12Talk mailing list provided as a service by Force 12 Antennas, Inc.
Force12 Web Site: http://www.force12inc.com

To Submit Message to the List: Force12Talk@qth.com
To unsubscribe and view the Message Archive: see http://qth.com/force12/list
For problems with the list: contact n4zr@qth.com



--------------------------------------------
Force12Talk mailing list provided as a service by Force 12 Antennas, Inc.
Force12 Web Site: http://www.force12inc.com

To Submit Message to the List: Force12Talk@qth.com
To unsubscribe and view the Message Archive: see http://qth.com/force12/list
For problems with the list: contact n4zr@qth.com

This Thread
  Date   Author  
10-May-2003 VR2BrettGraham
09-May-2003 mikekirchoff@msn.com
09-May-2003 Andrew Williamson
09-May-2003 Andrew Williamson
09-May-2003 Andrew Williamson
09-May-2003 WA9ALS - John
09-May-2003 Ray Minehan
09-May-2003 Jeff Griffin
09-May-2003 wa4dou@juno.com
09-May-2003 Andrew Williamson
09-May-2003 Andrew Williamson
09-May-2003 Andrew Williamson
09-May-2003 wa4dou@juno.com
09-May-2003 wa4dou@juno.com
09-May-2003 Andrew Williamson
09-May-2003 KXBill
09-May-2003 n3drk
09-May-2003 Reichow, Gary J.
09-May-2003 WD4K
09-May-2003 Guy Olinger, K2AV
09-May-2003 Tom Cox
09-May-2003 Pete Smith
09-May-2003 wa4dou@juno.com
09-May-2003 WD4K
09-May-2003 Andrew Williamson
* 08-May-2003 WD4K
08-May-2003 Jim Brannigan
08-May-2003 Andrew Williamson
07-May-2003 Andrew Williamson
06-May-2003 WD4K
06-May-2003 Steven Rutledge
06-May-2003 Guy Olinger, K2AV
06-May-2003 Andrew Williamson
06-May-2003 James W. Fisher, Jr.
05-May-2003 WD4K
This Author (May-2003)
  Subject   Date  
F12 dependability 09-May-2003
F12 dependability 09-May-2003
* F12 dependability 08-May-2003
F12 dependability 06-May-2003
F12 dependability 05-May-2003
Interaction? EF240 and C31XR 19-May-2003