Index Thread Archive May-2003 Archive Send
 Main index   Previous in threadNext in thread   Previous in archiveNext in archive   Index by Subject for May-2003Index by Author for May-2003Index by Date for May-2003   Index by Subject for ArchiveIndex by Author for ArchiveIndex by Date for Archive   Reply to messageNew message 

Subject: dipole vs. Mosley TA33-SR
Author: Roy D Lincoln <wa4dou@juno.com>
Date: 10-May-2003 17:13:40
>
> Two, angle of radiation. As you add in elements to a di-pole you
> will
> lower the angle of radiation.

I don't think the angle of radiation varies except in relationship to
antenna height above ground.

________________________________________________________________
The best thing to hit the internet in years - Juno SpeedBand!
Surf the web up to FIVE TIMES FASTER!
Only $14.95/ month - visit www.juno.com to sign up today!


--------------------------------------------
Force12Talk mailing list provided as a service by Force 12 Antennas, Inc.
Force12 Web Site: http://www.force12inc.com

To Submit Message to the List: Force12Talk@qth.com
To unsubscribe and view the Message Archive: see http://qth.com/force12/list
For problems with the list: contact n4zr@qth.com

This Thread
  Date   Author  
* 10-May-2003 Roy D Lincoln
10-May-2003 Peter Larsen
09-May-2003 force12e
09-May-2003 Barry Kirkwood
09-May-2003 Jim Brannigan
09-May-2003 Pete Smith
09-May-2003 n3drk
This Author (May-2003)
  Subject   Date  
Answer to Kens' post- 24-May-2003
* dipole vs. Mosley TA33-SR 10-May-2003
Force 12 vs. Tennadyne 05-May-2003